|
|
Post by richardklein on May 8, 2017 19:37:54 GMT -6
Why do you suppose Aland has brackets in Luke 24:5-6?
|
|
|
|
Post by samuel on May 9, 2017 12:22:18 GMT -6
If you have a copy of the Catholic "New American Bible", as I have. It explains it like so --
24:6 "he is not here, but he has been raised". This part of the verse is omitted in important representatives of the Western Text Tradition, but is present in other text types. The slight wording difference from Matthew 28:6 and Mark 16:6, argue for its retention.
Those important Western text representatives, would be of course the Alexandrian codices, and the Westcott and Hort Greek NT. |
|
|
|
Post by brianwagner on May 10, 2017 4:24:33 GMT -6
Aland, et al... in my opinion put too much weight on weak presuppositions used by most modern textual critics as their priority over better ones. Older is better, shorter is better, and more difficult is better, are borrowed premises from the liberal historical critical mindset. They do not honor the presuppositions of divine preservation/use, integrity of believing copyists, and clarity in inspiration.
|
|
